Too Much Nick

And here we see the fundamental dishonest characteristic of each and every article which advances this particular enraging argument. “Sure, it’s an objectively large sum of money,” they say. “But it is far smaller after I spend it.” No shit.

— The Top 1% Must Stop Insisting They’re Not Rich Right This Instant

Blunt’s proposal doesn’t just apply to religious employers and birth control. Instead, it would allow any insurer or employer, religiously affiliated or otherwise, to opt out of providing any health care services required by federal law—everything from maternity care to screening for diabetes. Employers wouldn’t have to cite religious reasons for their decision; they could just say the treatment goes against their moral convictions. That exception could include almost anything—an employer could theoretically claim a “moral objection” to the cost of providing a given benefit.

— The GOP Plan to Give Your Boss “Moral” Control Over Your Health Insurance | Mother Jones

Here we have millions of our fellow Americans unemployed, we have jihadist camps being set up in Latin America, which Rick has been warning about, and people seem to be so preoccupied with sex.

—

Republican Fails to Recognize Irony of His Words

Santorum Funder Friess: ‘Gals’ Used To Put Aspirin Between Their Knees For Contraception | TPM2012