July 2 2009
Post has 34 notes
sokeri
Text

Towards a system of categorisation of male looks.

sokeri:

indefensible:

So here are three kinds of male attractiveness.

1: Hyper-pretty men that everyone knows are attractive even if straight guys don’t say it because they are afraid of being called gay.  IE Brad Pitt.

2: Handsome guys that make women go week at the knees because they’re good looking but also somehow masculine: IE Clive Owen.

3: Guys that it would be awesome to look like because they’re not good looking but they look like they were carved out of stone with a chainsaw.

EG: Jurgen Prochnow. Even his name is fantastic. Say it. It’s like chewing tobacco and a handful of gravel at the same time. That’s one magnificent brute.

you can only come up with 3? as a straight woman, I could certainly come up with more than 3 kinds of female attractiveness.

There’s definitely a fourth category for “cute but not hot,” which include me and, if I’m not being insulting, our dear indefensible. Ladies: You are allowed to call me hot! But I’m not gonna say I’m any of the three above.

  1. fancycwabs reblogged this from nickdouglas and added:
    And then there’s the rest of us, who somehow manage in spite of being, you know, repulsive, apparently.
  2. nicolelee reblogged this from nickdouglas and added:
    The big thing for me, and this is definitely one of those vague indescribable things, is that it has to be absolutely...
  3. nickdouglas reblogged this from sokeri and added:
    There’s definitely a fourth category for “cute but not hot,” which include me and, if I’m not being insulting, our dear...
  4. indefensible reblogged this from sokeri and added:
    Nah, there’s tons more. This is just the beginning. Items 4 -22 are just different ways of describing what I see in the...
  5. nonlinearmind reblogged this from indefensible
  6. indefensible posted this