Ron Paul wants his namesake domain ( so badly that he's asking the United Nations for help. As it turns out, the current owners of said domain tried to cut him a deal regarding the domain.'s offer to Ron Paul:


After careful analysis of the available data, we are convinced that separating our grassroots website from would be counterproductive. There are literally hundreds of thousands of inbound links directed to specific articles, videos and blog posts at that would all be misdirected if you put up a new website at the domain.

Also, we have many email addresses, social media accounts, t-shirt designs etc. linked to the domain (in particular the popular Facebook page “”) that we would have to change or abandon. In short, such an abrupt change would lead to chaos on the Internet and - at least temporarily - disrupt the message of liberty.

To avoid these complications we’d like to offer you an alternative domain name,, for your new website at no cost whatsoever. Please don’t use a monstrosity such as “” as is being speculated on the forums. is an attractive, high quality alternative, and it won’t cost you anything. (Other than the annual renewal fee; all domains have to be renewed each year and that costs about $10 per year.)

If you do insist on obtaining (it is the best Ron Paul related domain name), we could relocate our grassroots site elsewhere and sell you the domain name at its current market price of $250,000. That would include a copy of our 170,000 strong email list; these supporters proactively signed up for our email updates, they expect and welcome frequent communications, and they are completely “untapped” in terms of donations. This means that you (and/or Campaign for Liberty) could easily make back the purchase price in a matter of days. Only you can put this list to its best possible use, which is why we’d include it as a free bonus with

It’s worth noting that Paul hadn’t registered the domains in 2008, which is why the fans who built the current site bought them instead. Considering that they would’ve arguably been more valuable when he was running for president, it’s strange that he wants them now. What’s crazier about this situation — that his supporters are trying to charge him $250,000 to ensure some T-shirts don’t have broken links or that Paul, who generally is anti-government-intervention, is trying to get the UN involved?

63 notes
  1. politiciansoc reblogged this from shortformblog
  2. maneatingbadger reblogged this from nickdouglas
  3. republicofideas reblogged this from shortformblog
  4. trxfreely answered: yep
  5. politicss reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    Well this is highly disappointing.
  6. woody reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    Funny on many levels.
  7. iamnobodysheroine reblogged this from shortformblog
  8. weirdellis reblogged this from occono and added:
    Is taken?
  9. n1ghtcrwler answered: To be fair, the UN isn’t, strictly speaking, a government.
  10. fartmountain reblogged this from shortformblog
  11. popelizbet reblogged this from shortformblog
  12. benbixler reblogged this from shortformblog
  13. ampoch reblogged this from shortformblog
  14. petercrocemusic reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
  15. maxistentialist said: Doesn’t Ron Paul support withdrawal from the UN?
  16. grammarmancer reblogged this from shortformblog
  17. fuzzyblueveggies reblogged this from shortformblog
  18. zackarooo said: "Government isn’t good for anything until I need it."
  19. stphn said: lol @ a libertarian asking an international coalition of governments to intervene
  20. weirdtexan reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    Why it’s important to do things right from the beginning. Own your domain.
  21. occono reblogged this from nickdouglas
  22. obi-wankenblowme reblogged this from shortformblog
  23. shamalam answered: It’s crazier that he is asking the UN. The response from the webmaster(s) of the site is spot on
  24. littleblondkid reblogged this from shortformblog
  25. section9 reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    So much for free market value…
  26. dendroica answered: Definitely the UN bit. The UN is the focus of so many conservative conspiracy theories.
  27. kyriarchy reblogged this from shortformblog and added:

Too Much Nick

Personal site of Nick Douglas, editor of Slacktory

About me

Email me